View Single Post
Old 02-22-2008, 09:17 AM   #95 (permalink)
fxashun
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,401
Country:
Points: 30,053, Level: 100
Points: 30,053, Level: 100 Points: 30,053, Level: 100 Points: 30,053, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
fxashun is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by baloney_detector View Post
Perhaps reading comprehension isn't your forte. Nowhere in my post is it stated or even implied that the number of homosexuals within a population is somehow controlled by the size of a population.
Maybe making up bullshit to try and create a point IS your forte. For homosexuality to be considered a form of population control, you would need to show how nature would create homosexuals as a reaction of population density. I have never seen any correlation. Even though homosexuality has been "observed in many species". Before your fault my reading comprehension, maybe you ought to think your bullshit through before you say it.

Quote:
You stated that "no species on the planet has a real use for homosexuality." Well, you are evidently wrong about this conclusion since homosexuality clearly plays a useful role in helping to limit the numbers within a population of some species, including the species, Homo Sapiens.
Could you present any evidence of this? Show any causation that separates it from the other sexual deviant desires. Because I can come up with a great bullshit support for pedophilia out of thin air too. I mean why would nature create humans that feel a sexual attraction to pre-pubescents? You have not shown how 2 to 3 percent of males being merely homosexual but still reproductively viable and wanting offspring will limit the population. That doesn't make sense.

Quote:
(Does your statement, "Try again. You lose," really seem to help boost your self-esteem...or something of that nature?)
No, I was just stating a fact. Your premise was illogical and poorly thought out. I've seen that "theory" presented before. And proven flawed to it's core.
This is my new signature.