View Single Post
Old 03-04-2008, 04:37 PM   #21 (permalink)
mikelew007
Community Leader
 
mikelew007's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Flint, MI
Gender: Male
Posts: 787
Country:
Points: 4,744, Level: 43
Points: 4,744, Level: 43 Points: 4,744, Level: 43 Points: 4,744, Level: 43
Level up: 97%, 6 Points needed
Level up: 97% Level up: 97% Level up: 97%
Activity: 15%
Activity: 15% Activity: 15% Activity: 15%
Send a message via Yahoo to mikelew007
mikelew007 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuttyjoe View Post
I agree with you, Mike. I like the fact that McCain disassociated himself from the Cunningham fiasco. Cunningham was obviously trying to scare America by associating Obama with Saddam Hussein- because of the similarity in the names. I give McCain kudos for that.

Heh. Obama was right about this being the silly season eh (OMFG! HIS MIDDLE NAME IS HUSSEIN!!!! RUN!!!!!)? But yea McCain did a good job in that little situation. Hats off to him!


I also agree with FX. The Obama steamroller will not be stopped. Nothing Clinton has said or done lately will change the 11 straight losses; or prevent any more. But I also agree that Tuesday will be the day of reckoning. I think if she loses 2 of the 4 states; you will see her supporters jumping ship quickly to Obama.

The polls (If you believe them) say that in both of the big states, it's gonna be a nail biter.

You and FX are right, Clinton cannot seem to slow Obama's momentum, but that might change depending on the outcome of today's primaries.

Worst-case scenario for Hillary: Obama wins Ohio and Texas (and Vermont) which would really hurt Hillary's campaign.

I predict though that the most likely even will be that he'll only take Texas and Vermont and Clinton will grab Ohio and Rhode Island, I don't think either state will overwhelmingly vote for either candidate. Will winning one big state help or hurt Clinton? I just don't know lol.

If Clinton wins both Texas and Ohio however, then she's back in the game.




Sponsored Links