Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin He interpreted the law which requires people being insured as contesting the validity of his being insured?
That's insane. Even if it WERE NOT valid, he WAS INSURED.
THAT'S what his job is.
It was blatant discrimination - which is why he folded immediately before going to court. | It seems you totally read over the part that we might agree on. Do you have some kind of disorder. Or is keeping sh*t going really what you thrive on?
I'll say it again. I think this guy should have gotten insurance coverage without all this bullshit. Geez dude. This is my new signature. |