View Single Post
Old 03-19-2008, 03:47 PM   #15 (permalink)
Katczinsky
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,657
Country:
Points: 14,046, Level: 76
Points: 14,046, Level: 76 Points: 14,046, Level: 76 Points: 14,046, Level: 76
Level up: 99%, 4 Points needed
Level up: 99% Level up: 99% Level up: 99%
Activity: 21%
Activity: 21% Activity: 21% Activity: 21%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuttyjoe View Post
Actually, he never lost Michigan if his name wasn't on the ballot! I still believe that both states should be ordered to have another primary at the end. That way, it's fair to both candidates. Obama's name must be on the ballots; and if Hillary has the Florida vote she thinks she does, then it's not unreasonable to ask her supporters to make that vote for her one more time. And if she does get those votes, then no problem.
As far as Michigan goes; I think the ballot spoke for itself. We only can suppose that Obama lost. But there is no proof.
The truth is, Hillary wants those delegates seated as is. It is Obama who wants them redone. It is Hillary who stands to lose more, not Obama; by a concerted effort by Obama to campaign in these states. 55%-45% victories will do nothing to help her when Obama wins his states by much larger percentages. That's why his delegate lead is close to 200. And each day passing will see more and more undecided delegates commiting to Obama.
I think your right; Obama would probably take Michigan with a good majority, and would probably split it pretty even in Florida. In the end Obama might take more delegates like he did coming out of March 4th, even though the Clintonites and the media like to peddle it to seem as a big win for Hillary.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72