What you are referring to is this issue.

http://www.defendingthetruth.com/con...tml#post109580 (Faked moon landing?)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There's a noticeable difference in the body movements in these two clips.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/a11v.1101330.rm

What I hypothesize is that only slow-motion was used in Apollo 11. Later, they improved thier methods of simulating lunar gravity and started using a combination of slow-motion and support wires. The slow-motion in the later missions might not have been exactly half-speed. It might have been sixty five or seventy percent of natural speed. It looked better but it was inconsistent with Apollo 11 footage. The inconsistency is apparent.

At around the 21 minute mark of this video the above footage from Apollo 11 can be seen played at double speed.

It looks just like movement in earth gravity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I was asking about this issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you look at the acceleration of the object that falls from the astronaut's backpack and the acceleration of the hammer and feather that fall, it's apparent that the there's a difference in the way gravity affects the objects differently.


Evidently the slow-motion speed is different.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You also didn't give your opinions of what I said about Jay Windley and the Clavius forum.

http://apollohoax.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=theories&action=display&thread=119 4111920
http://www.geologyrocks.co.uk/forum/q_and_a/a_strange_scenario_re_sifted_sand

The fact that Jay Windley and those regular posters at Clavius got caught telling a big lie about science is mere circumstantial evidence that Apollo was a hoax but it's pretty strong. Please say what you think about this.


Also, here's the latest thing I've found about the fluttering flag issue.

2 minure 35 second mark

This video was made by one of the regular posters at Clavius.


Look at this comment. It's the 75th one down.

michaelstmark
(excerpt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well Green', Bert's neat analysis has also inadvertently debunked the electrostatics attraction theory, by illustrating the flag moving very fractionally outwards in a bow wave effect just before the astronaut arrives - exactly as it does in the scaled-down atmosphere model demo' on AAM.

All credit to you again for spotting the anomalous flag move in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Evidently the flag moves slightly away from the astronaut just before it moves toward him because of the wave created by his approach.

Why it then moves toward his is explained at the 3 minute 5 second mark of this video.