View Single Post
Old 03-24-2008, 11:33 PM   #40 (permalink)
garysher
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,893
Country:
Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100 Points: 39,710, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hot dragon View Post
i stand corrected on the issue of laws relating to interracial marriage. a few countries have had such laws. most have had a prevailing culture that made interracial marriage very uncommon anyway.

the point to consider however is that the nature of marriage has changed in relation to interracial relationships. it was once uncommon, frowned on at best, shuned or banned outright at worst. but when society matured and interracial relationships became more common, we realised it was not an issue.

this parallels the debate on gay marriage.

Why?

Men and women are still men and women despite their colour.

But a redefinition of marriage to accommodate the homosexual dysfunction is an entirely different subject.




and garysher, why would i bother providing you with any information? you provide very little in your posts, and when you have you have given sources biased beyond reason. and then been unable to defend it. and when i have directed you to sources, you have completely ignored me. in fact, the only time you have every ignored me is when i have directed you to independent objective information.

that speaks volumes.
Show me what "objective information" you have provided.