View Single Post
Old 03-31-2008, 03:57 PM   #11 (permalink)
nuttyjoe
Council Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,203
Thanks: 65
Thanked 155 Times in 73 Posts

Points: 4,969, Level: 45
Points: 4,969, Level: 45 Points: 4,969, Level: 45 Points: 4,969, Level: 45
Level up: 46%, 181 Points needed
Level up: 46% Level up: 46% Level up: 46%
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
The more big states vote for Hillary the more the superdelegates may have to re-think their positions.

The margin between them is so small Hillary would be making a huge mistake if she abandoned all those supporters and the millions of voters who have given her 1500 delegates so far.

I still think a joint ticket is the right answer.

Fortunately, either one should be able to beat the venerable but geriatric John McCain and his more-of-the-same Bush lite message.
Ohio and Texas were supposed to be very key for Clinton. She won in numbers, but not in reality. What she won; she quickly forfieted back in the ensuing primaries. This is her position now. She must win overwhelmingly in every remaining primary to overtake Obama's lead. Highly improbable that she can win by such margins until the end. This is what all remaining superdelegates are waiting for: a mass exodus to Obama- to which they will join- or each and every high-profile endorsement- which they will follow suit. This is what's happening now. And how many more will follow up until Pennslyvania? How big will the lead be at that point?
Thanks for the info, H80! Try the ham yet?
nuttyjoe is offline   Reply With Quote