04-02-2008, 02:54 PM
|
#91 (permalink)
|
| Partisan Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 8,687 Points: 26,271, Level: 96 | Level up: 93%, 79 Points needed |  |  Quote:
Originally Posted by waitingtables  Nutty, I don't think the CEO and the prostitute are comparable, so I'm not sure how to respond to that. Sounds like the CEO is guilty of sexual harrassment though.
See there is another example of your double standard. If the man has something the woman wants, and he obtains sexual favours from her in exchange, you label that "sexual harassment".
But when the tables are turned you say:
"Why can't she sell sex if it isn't against her morality? That is called persuing liberty, and is protected under the Constitution. No one forces anyone to buy something or engage in behavior they find immoral"
See the hypocrisy yet??
And Gary, again, there are male prostitutes as well as female. And I take note of how you worded your statement above, that I applaud the abuse of men by women, but I rail against the ALLEGED abuse of women, by men. As I said, it is you who are showing your true colors with those kinds of words. If you are unable to appreciate women's issues in a truthful, historical sense, then I'm just wasting time thinking that you are capable of grasping reality. | It all depends on how you want to argue the facts.
Women can say that they were subjugated and abused by men in return for sex and bearing their children.
Men can say that women abused men by standing back and letting them become the providers, the warriors, the hunters and killers, whilst women were free to stay home in the warm, look after the children and fix their hair.
Clearly you have a very biased outlook toward the women's point of view in these matters.
|