View Single Post
Old 04-15-2008, 06:40 AM   #5 (permalink)
knot_e_lady
Congressional Representative
 
knot_e_lady's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,115
Thanks: 109
Thanked 385 Times in 194 Posts

Points: 10,008, Level: 66
Points: 10,008, Level: 66 Points: 10,008, Level: 66 Points: 10,008, Level: 66
Level up: 67%, 42 Points needed
Level up: 67% Level up: 67% Level up: 67%
Activity: 18%
Activity: 18% Activity: 18% Activity: 18%

I guess it would depend on the crime, wouldn't it?

Would I trust a pedophile to drive a school bus?

Would I like to know if a rapist lived next door?

Would I trust someone who has been to jail for stealing to run the cash register in a store?

To a certain extent, (and I can't believe I'm saying this) I agree with FX. You commit a crime, you have made a choice.

With that said, I do believe that people convicted of lesser offenses shouldn't be considered the same as serious criminals. For example, here in Michigan we have a really stupid law, called Driver's Responsibility law. Basically, what it is you get a ticket for something, and not only do you have to pay the ticket, but the state measures a fee against your license. If you don't pay the fee (which many people can't afford), your license gets suspended.

What's happening is, many people are getting arrested and sent to jail for driving on suspended licenses for the above reason. Should those people be considered the same as a murderer or rapist? Absolutely not. Drug users, either, or petty criminals.
knot_e_lady is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to knot_e_lady For This Useful Post:
CrazyFlamingos (04-15-2008)