View Single Post
Old 04-16-2008, 03:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
hot dragon
Community Leader
 
hot dragon's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: adelaide, australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 564
Country:
Points: 7,419, Level: 57
Points: 7,419, Level: 57 Points: 7,419, Level: 57 Points: 7,419, Level: 57
Level up: 35%, 131 Points needed
Level up: 35% Level up: 35% Level up: 35%
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
hot dragon is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by pensacola_niceman View Post
If you're really concerned about the environment, and realistic and the world's energy needs, you would embrace nuclear power. Jackson Brown and Jane Fonda don't know everything.
the economics of nuclear power simply do not add up.

they only make money if there is huge public subsidies in their building and running and disposal. financially they just dont work. the real advantage of nuclear was during the arms race of the cold war. without that incentive there is no reason to do it.