Quote:
Originally Posted by indago  Katczinsky has kanted:
Only in your wildest, and most lucid hallucinations!
YOU brought up the "All land in the British Empire was officially the property of His/Her Majesty's government" principle, which was a feudal society concept. A feudal society, and feudal law, is described in the 1870 law dictionary of Judge John Bouvier: |
It was your contention that state ownership of property is exclusively and
categorically 'communist' and 'feudal'. While the state (represented in feudalism by the nobility/aristocracy) owns property under feudalism, it is not a distinct feudalist doctrine (i.e. the state can own all property and not be feudal). Likewise it is not exactly the same thing.
Property under the context of feudalism means ownership of property
and vassals under 'reciprocal contract relations.'
Under the context of the 70-year old brief you're making such a big fuss about; all it means is that you can't legally burn your money.
Quote:
|
Concerning communist principles: "communism is the positive expression of annulled private property". — Marx 1844
|
Exactly, it's the positive expression of
annulled private property just as it is the overthrow of the class system. Communists seek to abolish the working class (proletariat) as much as they seek to abolish the ruling class (bourgeoisie). Under communism there wouldn't be any private property for the state to own; not to mention, under communism there wouldn't be a state to do the owning.
Quote:
|
The feudal society concepts, and communist principles, have no place in the United States, and should be repelled by all who come across them in their lives.
|
Reasons would be nice.
Expressing your philosophies is one thing, and such is indeed welcomed, but the unsubstantiated nonsense and complete misunderstandings of the allegations you're throwing around is getting annoying.