Quote:
Originally Posted by nuttyjoe Ther's also the scientific evidence to be considered. Put together with the psychogical factors, I can see trouble ahead for these officers. I'm not a lawyer or an evidence techician; but even I know that a standard- issue firearm for a police officer does not include such waeponry that can hold at any one time 31 shots.
This means that the officer shot and re-loaded his weapon; to shoot more. At what point did he figure that he didn't need to keep shooting? Why 31 shots? Why not 331 shots?
Thisis where the police officer's testimony will either exonerate them; or crucify them. | I'm sure Al Sharpton may lead calls for the latter, but I doubt it. He would want their badges. Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. Psalm 119:105 |