View Single Post
Old 04-25-2008, 03:14 PM   #5 (permalink)
highway80west
Moderator
Moderator
 
highway80west's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,889
Country:
Points: 18,585, Level: 86
Points: 18,585, Level: 86 Points: 18,585, Level: 86 Points: 18,585, Level: 86
Level up: 47%, 265 Points needed
Level up: 47% Level up: 47% Level up: 47%
Activity: 84%
Activity: 84% Activity: 84% Activity: 84%
highway80west is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by nuttyjoe View Post
Ther's also the scientific evidence to be considered. Put together with the psychogical factors, I can see trouble ahead for these officers. I'm not a lawyer or an evidence techician; but even I know that a standard- issue firearm for a police officer does not include such waeponry that can hold at any one time 31 shots.
This means that the officer shot and re-loaded his weapon; to shoot more. At what point did he figure that he didn't need to keep shooting? Why 31 shots? Why not 331 shots?
Thisis where the police officer's testimony will either exonerate them; or crucify them.
I'm sure Al Sharpton may lead calls for the latter, but I doubt it. He would want their badges.
Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. Psalm 119:105