View Single Post
Old 05-07-2008, 01:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
tristanrobin
*Premium Member*
Premium Member
 
tristanrobin's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,795
Country:
Points: 59,302, Level: 100
Points: 59,302, Level: 100 Points: 59,302, Level: 100 Points: 59,302, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 84%
Activity: 84% Activity: 84% Activity: 84%
Send a message via Yahoo to tristanrobin
tristanrobin is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
The word marriage should not be used referring to a homosexual union. It is not. If we can as a society place limits on age and family relation, then as a society we should be able to place limits on marriage as it relates to gender makeup.
Not if, as the O.P. states, the country is based on equality and not the caprices and/or tyrannies of the majority.

And there are already legal gay marriages in the U.S. - have been for years.
*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Conservatism: Self-centered mean-spiritedness fueled by ignorance and misguided self-importance.

Bigotry is a social disease.

Legalized same-sex marriage almost certainly benefits those same-sex couples who choose to marry, as well as the children being raised in those homes. - David Blankenhorn is president of the New York-based Institute for American Values and the author of "The Future of Marriage."
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tristanrobin For This Useful Post:
AlicornsPrayer (05-08-2008), CrazyFlamingos (05-07-2008), forester814 (05-09-2008)