 Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun  No one. But that's not the litmus. We already have limits on marriage that could arguably not cause damage if lifted. And the slope obviously IS slippery if you leave marriage strictly to legal interpretation. "Legal" gave us abortion and feticide in the same state. | It's funny that you use "litmus" as your analogy for something that should be considered acceptable or not (a binary question) when a litmus test itself only determines a DEGREE of how acidic or basic a chemical is.
So by your own definition, using the litmus analogy, whether two people should marry or not should be determined on a continuum of circumstances, and not "yes or no" based on established criteria.
And I'll be damn impressed if you understood all that. But feel free to show me that you are more intelligent than you seem. |