View Single Post
Old 05-08-2008, 11:02 AM   #132 (permalink)
fxashun
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,469
Country:
Points: 30,264, Level: 100
Points: 30,264, Level: 100 Points: 30,264, Level: 100 Points: 30,264, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
fxashun is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin View Post
There is no reason to disallow polygamy - we have no problem with a man shacking up with five women...but if he wants to actually commit to all five of them, THEN he's in trouble. It's stupid.
I agree. But we have MANY people all f'd up over it though. I really don't see any difference between that and just having a bunch of baby's mommas all over the place. But as a society we don't want it.

Quote:
There is no longer a reason to disallow incest - at one time it was believed (until fairly recently) that such unions produced flawed offspring, but it turns out that the problem is greatly exaggerated.
Yup. No real reason not to if we are gonna just make marriage just based on "who you love" and "rights". Might as well allow a couple sisters and brothers get married. Why not? But society frowns on that too.

Quote:
As with gay marriage, I believe that there would be very few opting for a polygamous marriage - and far fewer incestuous ones.
And from a human standpoint. There are very few gays. So lets just not allow it too. You know from a percentage standpoint. Only 1-2% of marriages are same sex.

Quote:
Having sex with animals is something that people who care more about such things can discuss. I have no interest.
Sounds like homosexuality to most other people...except of course in a homosexuality discussion forum. Or this web site which for some reason has WAAAY more gay marriage traffic than anything. Weird.
This is my new signature.