 Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear  Oh my goodness, Ali...no, I never even implied that the article was about gay sex. However, the article is saying that the riskier sexual practices are oral and anal sex.
That is the only kind of sex that gay people can engage in using their very own bodies, both being of the same sex. And if it is riskier sex for heterosexuals to engage in oral and anal sex, would it not stand to reason that it is also riskier for same sex couples to engage in as well? |
Then you must have a very short memory suddenly OD...Cause you did indeed said that the article was discussing homosexuals being the high risk...Let me remind you with your own post, that I incidentally already included in my previous response to you that you're now responding to and denying what you said... Quote:
Originally Posted by OhDear In this article, the sexual practices of the gay community are cited as those with greater risk. Both oral and anal sex are cited as what these young people are turning to in lieu of "vaginal sex"... | Now do you want to pretend that you didn't say " In this article, the sexual practices of the gay community are cited as those with greater risk."
That is indeed you saying that THE ARTICLE TALKED ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY and it's supposedly being at greater risk...
Not my words OD...YOUR words...
The article made absolutely no mention of anything other then HETROSEXUAL SEX...Your adding into it that it supposedly talked about homosexuality has not a thing to do with with what that article was discussing.
Simply put...Doesn't matter what risks there might/might not be in regards to homosexual sexual intercourse...The article isn't about it so it has nothing to do with the discussion and who you think is/isn't at risk...Or do you now have issues staying on topic and not turning discussions into 'gay sex talk' like your buds FX and Gary? |