View Single Post
Old 05-16-2008, 12:53 PM   #38 (permalink)
garysher
Partisan
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,987
Country:
Points: 31,380, Level: 100
Points: 31,380, Level: 100 Points: 31,380, Level: 100 Points: 31,380, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by waitingtables View Post
Gary, you keep going round and round this after it has been answered. When a man ejaculates into a woman, he is stuck with whatever choice that woman makes. There aren't any options that he can argue. If she wants to keep it, he is responsible for his share of the support. If she decides to terminate, he has no say in the matter. He made his choice when he had unprotected sex and impregnated her. The rest is up to her, because it is her body that supplies what is necessary for the development of the embryo into a fetus into a human being. No one can make that choice for her, nor should they be legally allowed to.

Why not? You aren't giving any reason other than because you think so!

Why should the woman have a right to unilaterally deprive the father of his baby?

Or why should the woman have the right to unilaterally compel the father to pay financial support for 18 years?

What happened to your passion for sexual equality?