 Quote:
Originally Posted by waitingtables  Child abuse at the FLDS is hidden very well by them That is why investigations take time. Pregnant teens are a sign of abuse. 100 kids not belongong to parents is a sign of abuse. Court recorded tesitmony from someone who was there is evidence. Adults who have children who are old enough to show that the mother was underage at the time of pregnancy is abuse. A convicted leader of the community on abuse charges is enough to spur an investigation. | The pregnant "teens" turned out to be 18 and 20 something. "Pregnant teens" is not a sign of abuse. It's a sign somebody is getting ready to have a baby.
100 kids "not belonging to parents" is not a sign of abuse until you know "why" they are there. Isn't there a school on the ranch?
Who is the person that was at THIS ranch? Where is that?
The age differential prove "abuse" or that it happened in Texas though. Or that any "abuse" is currently happening to extent that you need to remove ALL the children. That just shows a lack of "investigation".
And one convicted leader convicted of abuse charges doesn't warrant what Texas did. Good luck with your blind hate though. Facts aren't panning out so far. This is my new signature. |