fxashun;
Quote:
|
Which evolutionary constructs includes homosexuality as normal but not the other two. I'd like to see that.
|
the ones you have been shown and consistenty ignore.
Quote:
|
There is no proven genetic support for homosexuality yet.
|
false
Quote:
|
There are studies across a couple species that indicate it might be prenatal hormone related. Which would explain the differences in gay twins.
|
there is much more than that, which you would know if you bothered to get informed.
i refer you to the original post in this thread. again.
Quote:
|
Very true. That's why I don't use "society" as my standard for deeming homosexuality aberrant.
|
you don't use any of the available evidence either, you use prejudice.
society is too variable across time and place for the
details of any one society to be used as a standard (other than the prehistorical societies that shaped our evolution, but this is impossible to study directly). but the very fact that we
are a social species with evolved social structures is not variable, and something you are ignoring. again.
Quote:
|
Some humans "choose" to have alternative sexual activities.
|
true
Quote:
|
But homosexuals claim to have the innate partnering urge pointed toward their same gender.
|
true
false.
Quote:
|
One thing about human intelligent is the ability to look at things and see that they are illogical.
|
by this argument, you are either not human or not intelligent.
Quote:
|
And to MANY people, looking at same gendered sexual activity is f'd up along the same lines as the other mentioned sexual deviant urges.
|
to MANY people, women are inferior, evolution is a grand atheist cospiracy, noahs ark has been found and the holocaust never happened.
see what happens when you listen to people who do not look at evidence? lots of people believing it often means lots of people are ignorant.
Quote:
|
That's not what I'm saying. You'll do better just addressing the point as you understand it instead of telling me what I'm thinking.
|
you're not thinking. you're ranting.
Quote:
|
Nothing has been illuminated yet since there is nothing to illuminate.
|
false
Quote:
|
Scientists don't have a clue.
|
false
Quote:
|
And since negative research on homosexuality gets scientists in trouble the same way negative racial research does, if the answer paints homosexuality in a negative light,
|
you really have fallen for the religious right propaganda, havent you? some grand conspiracy of the "gay agenda" to take over the world, right?
Quote:
|
I don't see the anything useful coming out any time soon.
|
lots of useful stuff has come out. it shows you are wrong.
Quote:
|
But telling me that you have somehow "illuminated" something is the same bullshit as the "circular argument" and "I've shown proof" is. And those have been shown to be lies as well.
|
when?
i suggest a new signature for you. how about "i'm arrogant, ignorant, stupid and narrow minded"
i can't comment on the handsome. send a photo.