Originally Posted by hot dragon

garysher;

What was the point of publishing a bunch of titles to documents that are inaccessible??!

to demonstrate what the scientific literature is discussing. and to demonstrate that the information opposing the naturalness of homosexuality is NOT informed by any reliable evidence. and to demonstrate that the information you might find on google is somewhat unreliable and unvetted for accuracy. these links i presented are accessable if you bother to take the time to go to a library or you have access yourself to subscription on line sources. it may take a bit more work, but if you would rather get informed through google searches and reading any crap anyone can post on any website without having to justify it, go for it.

Yeah right


Are you trying to reverse millenia of human wisdom by trying to convince us that homosexuality isn't a dysfunction after all?

this is the nature of scientific progress. the evidence mounts that shows the conventional wisdom is flawed, a new paradigm is introduced that is consistent with the evidence.

if we refused to ever reverse years of human wisdom, we would still be saying blacks were an inferior species, women were inherently unintelligent, the earth is flat, flying machines are impossible.

do you want me to continue with examples of things people have always thought were true that were wrong?

anyway, there was no need for a reversal of millenia of human wisdom, just a reversal of the last few centuries of christian driven cultural norms.