View Single Post
Old 10-06-2005, 03:58 PM   #20 (permalink)
hevusa
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,019
Country:
Points: 30,040, Level: 100
Points: 30,040, Level: 100 Points: 30,040, Level: 100 Points: 30,040, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 6%
Activity: 6% Activity: 6% Activity: 6%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaxian
Well, I don't think that you're targetting the correct problem. In this most recent vote, for example, George Bush would still have been elected even if we got rid of the electoral college and implemented runoff elections. He had the majority vote.
Not true. If IRV had been in effect dubya would not have won. He would not have held the majority in the first place.
And Clinton may not have won in 92 if IRV had been in effect...
Most people would think that is 2 for 2!
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.