Quote:
Originally Posted by hot dragon  but the drives are NOT dysfunctional, the drives are THE SAME as the drives in heterosexual relationships. |
I agree. It's just misdirected. A "intersexed" person's male feelings are the same as mine, they just have crossed genitalia. With all the defects in humans, especially as it relates to gender and sex, homosexuality isn't all that hard to fathom.
You asked..
if homosexual relationships were "f**ked up" we would expect the dynamics of the relatinship to be abnormal, but we do not see that. we see normal healthy relationships, consistent with normal healthy people
I was simply pointing out that pedophiles are capable of having relationships if they are allowed. Obviously not every pedophile actually physically abuses their "partner". I guess that explains your abbreviated quote of that part of my post.
Quote:
|
presumably you can direct me to some psychologists who thing homosexuality is abnormal who do not have a religious agenda?
|
Just as soon as you point me to some bonafide evidence that homosexuality is a evolved human trait. In a way that goes full circle like heterosexuality, respiration, digestion, and circulation..
Quote:
|
relevance still eludes me.
|
That's because you obviously didn't read what I wrote in it's entirety as it relates to what you typed. But again, I said a lot more than what you quoted.
Quote:
|
paedophiles have abberent neurological profiles when it comes to sexuality.
|
Really? What is the aberrant profile? Who were the subjects. Was it questionable sources like early homosexual studies that only looked at incarcerated pedophiles? I'd like to see that research. Because I've read a study that said that it is possible that many men have at least unconscious attraction to youth. But then again, like with homosexuality, "research" is all over the place. If at all.
Quote:
|
true for paedophiles. not true for gays, there chemistry and neurology is normal.
|
Not in all cases. A male with female reactions to men isn't normal. It may be for a gay man, but that's not normal. But if you apply that same relativistic approach to pedo, you still come up with brain activity that is normal for pedo, just not normal for humans.
Quote:
|
this is the trimmed, edited version. there are HUNDREDS of similar articles.
|
I disagree. I don't think you read a single one. And this post doesn't point me at a single relevant one from that list. Which should be easy with "hundreds" to choose from. The silence is as deafening as your lack of real links to those generic non-descript articles.
Quote:
|
like thinking gays are f**ked up.
|
They are.
Quote:
|
i have presented this, and you just complained that it was too much.
|
Not too much, just a lot of useless links with no reason why they were included. And when I read some of them, they said nothing of any use to my argument. It's like showing a picture of Jupiter when I looking for Mars.
Quote:
|
forgive me for thinking of you as another human being. i will endeavour to think of you as no more than text, if that makes you feel more comfortable.
|
That's how I think of you. I don't know you. Just another group of words to reply to. No big deal.
Debate the topic, not the person.
This is my new signature.