View Single Post
Old 05-29-2008, 12:04 AM   #129 (permalink)
hot dragon
Community Leader
 
hot dragon's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: adelaide, australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 577
Country:
Points: 7,905, Level: 59
Points: 7,905, Level: 59 Points: 7,905, Level: 59 Points: 7,905, Level: 59
Level up: 78%, 45 Points needed
Level up: 78% Level up: 78% Level up: 78%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hot dragon is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
Why are you so eager to tilt the table?

I might as well ask how many psychologists who consider homosexuality to be normal are atheists or have no strong religious conviction.

Nearly all of them I would guess.

The fact is that nobody has decided that the APA should be the arbiter of our moral values.

nor has anyone decided that those with strong religious convictions should be the arbiter of our moral values.

psychologists and psychiatrists are human. like all humans they are predominantly religious, most of my colleagues profess a christian faith, although there are growing numbers of muslim medical people in australia. as professionals, they do not let their religion guide their understanding of evidence.

garysher, you are sounding increasingly like a paranoid conspiracy theorist. our agenda, to destroy the fabric of civilization as we know it, starting by allowing gay marraige, infiltrating the ranks of universities and professional organisations with our spies, silencing dissent, killing God, with the aim to control the world !!!

the APA has not tried to impose morality on you. they have accepted the weight of evidence that illustrates homosexuality as a variation of normal healthy human sexuality. they have accepted that there is nothing wrong with it, that it fits well into our understanding of humanity in every field from sociology to evolution. of interest, the WHO, AMA, and every other professional organisation in the world have also accepted the same evidence in the same light. nobody is imposing anything. quite the opposite, they are recognising that past impositions and restrictions were unfair as they were no more than social prejudices dressed up as science.

what you do with this information is up to you. your morality is your decision.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to hot dragon For This Useful Post:
AlicornsPrayer (05-29-2008), CrazyFlamingos (05-29-2008), tristanrobin (05-29-2008)