06-04-2008, 06:16 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
| *Premium Member* Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles Gender:  Posts: 11,785 Country:  Points: 39,412, Level: 100 | Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by tristanrobin I never said differently.
I never said that the marriages performed in 2003 were legal - they were quite clearly NOT...even though I approved of them personally.
That was a very very very different situation than marriages that are performed legally. | Irrelevant.
When the drinking age was raised to 21, people aged 18 to 20 didn't retain the right to drink they previously had.
No 'grandfathering" applies to these sham marriages either, especially the ones from out of state. knowuryder: and I should care what some dullard on a message board thinks about me because why exactly? |