Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher This decision clearly shows the bias of these four activist judges, who not only flout the will of Californian voters, but have dismissed the explicit demands of at least 10 other states, who may be threatened by this decision if homosexuals travel to California, get 'married' then return home and demand their state recognise this travesty. It would have been far wiser for them to wait a few months until the result of the ballot is known regarding a Constitutional Amendment, which would require voiding these bogus unions. But at least we know the real agenda of these activist judges. | So, essentially what you are saying is that you are opposed to gay marriage? |