View Single Post
Old 06-05-2008, 02:31 PM   #57 (permalink)
garysher
*Premium Member*
Premium Member
 
garysher's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,785
Country:
Points: 39,412, Level: 100
Points: 39,412, Level: 100 Points: 39,412, Level: 100 Points: 39,412, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
garysher is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigerwiccan View Post
I don't think they would be able to nullify legal marriages. The other ones that Newsome ordered were void because they were done illegally. But these will all be completely legitimate marriages. I think that is what will sway the people to not vote to overturn the ruling, since it will already be happening. And it's CA we're talking about here.
When the ballot successfully mandates an amendment to protect traditional marriage, any homosexual "marriages" that happen in the interim will be voided, or outlawed.

This includers marriages of homosexuals from other states who try to "wag the dog" back home.

I think you'll find the people of California will teach these 4 activist judges a lesson and say Yes.

Don't judge California on the 'homopoovres' parading around Folsom St or West Hollywood.

Outside of the 2 major metropolitan areas, rural California is still quite conservative, and so is the huge latin community.
[IMG][/IMG]
knowuryder: and I should care what some dullard on a message board thinks about me because why exactly?