View Single Post
Old 06-09-2008, 02:12 PM   #79 (permalink)
OKgrannie
Block Captain
 
OKgrannie's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 447
Country:
Points: 6,999, Level: 55
Points: 6,999, Level: 55 Points: 6,999, Level: 55 Points: 6,999, Level: 55
Level up: 25%, 151 Points needed
Level up: 25% Level up: 25% Level up: 25%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
OKgrannie is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grace View Post
"Accepting the science of the time that claimed sterilization saved the feebleminded, who were not capable of parenting, from themselves and from a life of institutional confinement, it seemed only common sense to Margaret Sanger to approve an operation that had no effects on the individual's life other than to prevent conception."

If you agree with this statement, you support eugenics. If you had actualy read the site I provided you would know that her goal was to mask eugenics by calling them "choice", or "rights", so this quote from her is realy no surprise. What I dont understand is how you totaly look past all the other quotes, clearly exposing her for the monster that she was.
Here is more about one of Sanger's quotations. Don't be so gullible, Grace, the people attempting to smear Sanger have their own agenda, and it isn't a pretty one.

MSPP > Newsletter

For instance she wrote to philanthropist Clarence Gamble in 1939:
The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the [Birth Control] Federation [of America] as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members. (MS to Clarence Gamble, MSM S17:574)
Anti-choice groups attempting to discredit Sanger frequently extract the line "we don't want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population" without offering context or intelligent explanation....
In this instance, MSPP editor and director Esther Katz thought it necessary to respond to the Wall Street Journal because of the prestige and large circulation of the paper. She based her response on a close reading of the documents in question, offering more complete extractions of Sanger's writings. "The textual evidence reveals," she wrote, "that Sanger did not rationalize her support for birth control on racist grounds, that she never advocated genocidal policies aimed at racial, ethnic or religious groups, and that she, in fact, believed access to birth control would benefit, not eliminate minority populations.""
The greatest danger to liberty lurks in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.

--Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to OKgrannie For This Useful Post:
AlicornsPrayer (06-10-2008), Catus Felidae (06-09-2008), waitingtables (06-10-2008)