fxashun;
And also a long history of producing f'd up things too. Nothing that indicates homosexuality is a product of evolution of just an f-up.

other than the numerous theoretical constructions that were presented last time you brought this up. and the original evidence at the beginning of this thread. but if you want to think that is all "nothing" i guess i will never be able to stop you.

Quote:

I know what this study reported..Do you? What are we discussing? Who was studied? Where did they source the subjects? Neuroimage. 2008 May 15;41(1):80-91. Epub 2008 Feb 20. PMID: 18358744 [PubMed - in process Again, what are we discussing? Nothing. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2008 Jan;33(1):23-33. PMID: 18197269 [PubMed - indexed for Okay? Pretty much. Nothing to discuss. No links or anything.

able to find them though, nice how references work like that.

exactly what i predicted you would do when presented with evidence. ignore, discard it as unreliable or irrelevant and misinterpret it. you managed to resist the urge to cry politics though, well done.

thanks for additional information. the point is clearly over your head. for the benefit of others, this information illustrates that humans have a normal arousal pattern that is present and identical in straight and gay people. there is also an abnormal arousal pattern that is distinct, different and present in paedophiles.

your information and my information illustrate that brain scans are capable of identifying abnormal sexual responses in paedophiles. and do not identify anything abnormal in homosexuals. to use this evidence to say that paedophilia is comparable to homosexuality is just dumb.

um, these are not brain scans. they are population data that show a small difference between groups on the frequency of lefthandedness. they are 2 unrelated studies collecting data in different ways from different populations and drawing different conclusions. you have juxtaposed them here to try and make them appear connected in a way that is grossly deceptive.

that there is nowhere near enough data to make any conclusions. there are hundreds of studies on homosexuality. there are lots on paedophiles, although not as many. the studies include genetic testing, cross sectional, longitudinal follow up, twin studies, brain scan data, arousal data, lots of different kinds of data collected over decades. there is enough to draw some conclusions.

the data on zoophilia is one study. a questionaire from a small and self selected group of people on the internet. if you regard that as definitive in any way you are a fool. the only conclusion one can draw is that there is not enough information to draw any conclusions.

no literature of your own presented either. links are ok, but the original data is always better.