 Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256  I disagree... It's not unnatural, lots of species have homosexual members, as for it being illogical, most of what people do is illogical, and not all homosexual relationships are dysfunctional. | Lots of species have retarded members and physically impaired members too. Things that "occur" in nature aren't always "natural". Sh*t happens. And apparently as it relates to homosexuality, it happens about 2-5% of the time. I'm not saying all homosexual relationships are dysfunctional from a "two people getting along" POV. The same could be said of any of the sexual deviant urges. And not all heterosexual relationships pass the functionality test if that's your criteria. Quote: |
I don't think it is an affront at all. On the contrary, I would contend that since we create the definition of our words, and we frequently change them, it would be a small, but natural change to include same-sex unions in the term marriage.
| And I would contend that to change the societal recognition of the only union that has purpose and reason for our species and nearly every complex species of anything on this planet to include an union that is essentially null and void to anything and serves absolutely no natural purpose IS an affront to human intelligence. This is my new signature. |