View Single Post
Old 06-17-2008, 10:14 AM   #20 (permalink)
tadpole256
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,486
Country:
Points: 55,597, Level: 100
Points: 55,597, Level: 100 Points: 55,597, Level: 100 Points: 55,597, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 32%
Activity: 32% Activity: 32% Activity: 32%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
Lots of species have retarded members and physically impaired members too. Things that "occur" in nature aren't always "natural". Sh*t happens. And apparently as it relates to homosexuality, it happens about 2-5% of the time. I'm not saying all homosexual relationships are dysfunctional from a "two people getting along" POV. The same could be said of any of the sexual deviant urges. And not all heterosexual relationships pass the functionality test if that's your criteria.


And I would contend that to change the societal recognition of the only union that has purpose and reason for our species and nearly every complex species of anything on this planet to include an union that is essentially null and void to anything and serves absolutely no natural purpose IS an affront to human intelligence.
Did you seriously liken homosexuality to retardation? I hate to tell you this, but retards (for the most part) are natural too. No one chose to be a retard.

I suspect that when you say dysfunctional you are reffering to the fact that homosexuals cannot bear their own children? Does that mean you want to redefine marriage as an institution for the sole purpose of bearing children? If that's the case, I can't get married either, and I am straight as they come, but I don't want kids.

Finally, to call it "the only union that has purpose and reason" is ridiculous. It's rhetorical nonsense. All unions have a purpose, otherwise they would not exist, and most of those purposes are really quite reasonable. I would say the employee-employer union has just as much purpose and reason. You are really being overly dramatic here.

Marriage isn't some natural thing that our species depends on to survive. It is an abstract social construct. And as such it is open to be modified by the society which it serves.
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey





The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to tadpole256 For This Useful Post:
AlicornsPrayer (06-17-2008), Catus Felidae (06-17-2008), CrazyFlamingos (06-17-2008), Nightrider (06-17-2008), OnTheLeft (06-17-2008), tristanrobin (06-17-2008)