View Single Post
Old 06-29-2008, 07:41 PM   #30 (permalink)
fxashun
SIMPLETON
Premium Member
 
fxashun's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,466
Country:
Points: 30,255, Level: 100
Points: 30,255, Level: 100 Points: 30,255, Level: 100 Points: 30,255, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
fxashun is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelsey View Post
this has nothing to do with privacy. you keep using examples that do not have anything to do with the principle that you are trying to defend.
Well, maybe you ought to be more clear with this interlock device you are talking about. Because the way you aree describing it, it's like having a brain scan determine whether or not I'm going to speed every time I get behind the wheel.
"I" as a non drinker do not want or need a device on my car to give me permission to drive. Nor do "I", as a habitual speeder, need a device on my car that would give me permission to drive nor record my speed for future reference if I do so. Both are invasions of my privacy. While you interlock may work for habitual drinkers, most Americans would not approve of them in their own cars.
This is my new signature.