07-05-2008, 04:36 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Los Angeles Gender:  Posts: 11,893 Country:  Points: 39,710, Level: 100 | Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed | | Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256 See that's what I like about him... He wants to get rid of the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, The IRS, The Federal Reserve, and a lot of other useless baggage in the government.
Getting rid of the Department of Education does not mean NOT providing people with public education, it means leaving it to the states to do so and to regulate it. Time has shown that anything regulated by the federal government is done so poorly, and anything run by the federal government is done so poorly. Programs like "no child left behind" have been a miserable failure. Not always. What about NASA and the US military - not exactly miserable failures!!
The best thing we can do for our children is to give parents vouchers for their education, and let the parents choose where to send them to school. The free market does a far better job of regulation than any organized government system ever could.
I agree in part, I sent my kids to private schools but it was very expensive and required a lot of sacrifices. But it definitely was a higher standard of education.
Not everyone could afford to educate their children in the private sector and many more would choose not to.
The U.S. was founded on capatalist free-market ideals, they are what made us great. We started going down hill when we began allowing ourselves to become dependent on the government for everything. We have become a welfare society, and it is holding us back. | Capitalism isn't without its flaws either.
47m Americans have no health insurance, millions more are under-insured and yet millions more are forced to cling on to jobs they hate just to get coverage.
7% of US marriages happen just to get coverage for one of the partners.
Whilst the health insurance companies make money Americans are literally dying because they are denied insurance.
If public education were abolished it's inevitable that millions of kids would get no education, and that's not good for any country.
Things have changed since the 1780's |