Thread: gitmo
View Single Post
Old 02-25-2006, 02:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
hevusa
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,013
Country:
Points: 29,896, Level: 99
Points: 29,896, Level: 99 Points: 29,896, Level: 99 Points: 29,896, Level: 99
Level up: 94%, 104 Points needed
Level up: 94% Level up: 94% Level up: 94%
Activity: 12%
Activity: 12% Activity: 12% Activity: 12%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
Re: gitmo
Quote:
Originally Posted by mandiejo
once again, debate related. sorta. gitmo, short for guantanamo bay, was just on c-span, where the nat.'l security advisor stephen hadley said that most people wish there weren't any gitmo's, but that they are in fact necessary to the war on terror. if we have any policy debaters on here whatsoever, what's your stance on granting POW status under the resolution?

I don't see how stripping people of their right to a trial as being necessary to the war on terror. I would argue that it creates more fuel for the enemy and may even create more enemies overall.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.