 Quote: |
Originally Posted by foundit66 Quote: |
Originally Posted by mandiejo once again, that was one of my AFFIRMATIVE cases! i've made all these arguments in rounds! i just wanna see some better negative arguments than we heard because we almost never lost an affirmative round with that case, unless they tried to change our harms to abuse but that's a different story. so i know where you're coming from, we've personally made those arguments. i'd like to see some negation. | Ah. I misunderstood what you said in your earlier statements.
My apologies.
It's something I'ld have to think about.
It's kind of a "slippery slope" way of thinking for me. I could try to give some arguments with some degree of opposition, but the further a position comes to polar opposite of all this the less and less I can think of to justify it...
And you may have given it before, but if it's not too much trouble, could you please explicitly state the "Resolution" that this is covering?
I'm just curious. | no problem, here goes.
Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially decrease its authority either to detain without charge or search without probable cause.
that's basically the whole deal with debate, you have to be able to argue pro and con on something no matter what just as convincingly both ways. forget how you really feel, it comes with the territory.  |