Yeah, note that I said that it was "supposed to be about" spreading the idea of democracy and personal liberties in the middle east. I think bringing up the rich history of a cultural fued is more than relevent to the American colonialism in the Middle East. Mostly because Bush himself mentioned it as a "crusade" (literally) on live television a number of times.

That I'm sure sent chills down any Arab that saw that. The whole idea of Bush's that it is a noble and devine "crusade", that is the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, as an undertaking chosen by God, is a very reason for their declaring of Jihad. Between the two, the Christain radical in America's government, and the Islamic radical in the Middle East, it really is a war of religion. Both sides believe they are representing God. Bush seriously thinks America is the right arm of God.

I'm pretty sure clerics in the middle east don't care about domestic policy in Denmark, but I'm also very sure they most certainly care about domestic policy in Denmark that effects them. If they didn't care, then they wouldn't be rioting. They want accountability for the cartoons, they want apologies, and they don't want it to happen again. The way you make sure it doesn't happen again is enforcing laws telling them not to do it again.

Bush believes it his devine right granted by God to "spread freedom and democracy" in the middle east. The fact that he is failing at this is a different debate. The fact that he is stealing resources, opposing democracy in Iraq because he will know that it will lead to anti-western doctrine, and the fact that he has a brutal grip on the populace probably just as or more brutal than Saddam's is beside the point. He believes in what he says, and he's attempting to jam it down their throats whether they like it or not. To him the ends justify the means. To him he must not only do what "god tells him to do", but to ensure American dominence in the world by any means nessissary.

This is what I mean by a war of ideas.