View Single Post
Old 03-09-2006, 03:52 PM   #32 (permalink)
hevusa
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,019
Country:
Points: 30,040, Level: 100
Points: 30,040, Level: 100 Points: 30,040, Level: 100 Points: 30,040, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyreay
1,300 researchers, Doctors and leaders in their fields, from 45 countries, think you are wrong. Geology, Biology, our whole understanding of science, is built on what you are now trying to call theory. Going back to such a basic argument as evolution is theory is not looking at any of the above info objectively. Why does the last sentence sound familiar? I notice a trend here to change the subject...... Sedimentary science is that advanced; on the other hand, if you think we did not evolve, just say so.
Wrong-o!

I am NOT going back to some argument about evolution.

What I AM saying is that much of what we call "science" - in regards to what we believe happened millions of years ago - is "speculation".

Some of it certainly is. But we are talking about current research from the last 100 years.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.