 Quote: |
Originally Posted by Jefferson Quote: |
Originally Posted by Dylan Actually, a change in atmospheric composition would be indicated by the petrified trees, erosion patterns, and sediment layers. I am not assuming that erosion and decomposition took place at the same rate. It all depends on the environment. Radioactive dating doesn't though. Decay rates are pretty steady. That's what is used for the actual time measurement. The evidence is dated, and then analyzed.
Seriously dude, you have no idea what you are talking about. I think you should go talk to someone at the science department of your local college. He or she might be able to straighten out your misinformation about how the past is pieced together from evidence. | So... because I'm challenging your narrow little view, and I may not agree with you, you assume that I'm ignorant. You assume I'm not educated and/or that I'm fully unfamiliar with science and education.
Wow. So I'm qualified to teach at the college level, but you're suggesting that I go to college. Okay Bubba.  | You have no understanding of scientific theory. This isn't a theory. This is not a narrow little view, it is observable, provable fact. I'm not talking about the big bang, or quantum physics here. Climatic changes on Earth over the last few million years or so are entirely quantifiable. A theory would be what caused the changes to take place, or what impact the changes had on evolution.
I don't know you in real life. You may be qualified to teach something at a college level, but it sure isn't science.
It's kind of funny how you have some life experience that makes you an expert on every thread on this board.  |