 Quote: |
Originally Posted by Jefferson Quote: |
Originally Posted by foundit66 I never said ""scientific theory" is "proven fact"."
Take your straw-man arguments elsewhere...
Lying about my position only diminishes your own credibility...
Scientific theory is not "proven fact", but it is a LOT MORE than just the casual means you referenced it.
In some ways, your response also demonstrates that you STILL do not understand what "scientific theory" is...
Do you have ANY CLUE as to how many issues in science are still referenced as "theory"?
(That, and referencing "philosophy"?
YOu're only proving my point...) | Thank you for admitting that what I've been saying is right.
It is just that - scientific THEORY. | You truly hear whatever you want to, don't you.
It's not "just" a scientific theory.
If you had any concept of what is required for something to qualify as a "scientific theory", you wouldn't refer to it as "just" a scientific theory.
It's like saying that all Jack did was "just" win the Nobel prize.
You keep treating the term "scientific theory" like it's a DIMINISHED capacity instead of an arduous and grueling noteworthy status.
Do you even know what "scientific theory" means as a term?
Could you define it? Quote: |
Originally Posted by Jefferson The FACT is that I DO KNOW how many issues in science are still "theory" - and that therefore, people like YOU need to have the intellectual integrity to admit that they are "scientific theory" and stop trying to cram them down everybody's throats as "proven facts".
Very funny!  | Do us all a favor.
DEFINE "scientific theory".
Tell us what "scientific theories" are out there right now.
Go beyond just "evolution" and the ones you are skeptical of because your religion tells you to be so...
This should be good for a laugh... |