 Quote: |
Originally Posted by foundit66 Quote: |
Originally Posted by Jefferson It always amazes mye how terribly insecure some of you folks are!
Why not admit that there are SEVERAL different "scientific theories" concerning what the earth was like - complete with its atmosphere - several million years ago.
The Fission Theory believes that the moon was, at one time, part of the earth and somehow separated from the earth. | I challenge you to point to any legitimate scientific journal that refers to that as a "theory". Quote: |
Originally Posted by Jefferson Shoot, there's even great debate as to whether or not the earth's magnetic fields remain constant or not. If, for instance, the North Pole is actually moving, as some "theorize" it is, then other elements of the atmosphere are changing as well. | And AGAIN you are clueless as to scientific terminology.
That would be referred to "hypothesizing" at best.
NOT "theorizing"... Quote: |
Originally Posted by Jefferson You need to admit that it is a great deal of THEORY and SPECULATION. You lose a lot of credibility when you just put your hands over your ears and scream, "It's fact! It's fact! It's fact!" | You haven't a clue as to what SCIENTIFIC theory means. You're too caught up in the LAY-PERSON'S definition of "theory".
The fact that you use the phrase "theory and speculation" is further proof of what I'm talking about.
And do you have any clue as to what the term "scientific fact" means AT ALL???
Why don't you just admit it?
Stop trying to b.s. your way through this and just admit you're clueless on the issue of science?
Nobody's buying it... | 
Why are you being so angrily defensive?  |