 Quote: |
Originally Posted by onthefence You may want to pay closer attention.
Jay was in favor of the war before the status of WMDs was known.
Jay has ferociously criticized Bush’s policy on Iraq war for risking the lives of US troops unnecessarily after it was found that there was no weapons of mass destruction.
Severin maintains that US should use weapons of mass destruction as a primary and sole weapon and all the US had to do was “drop a nuke on Afghanistan and Iraq, instead of putting Americans soldiers at risk unnecessarily (In Jay Severin has issues January 23, 2006).”
Nuke them and get out is how I belive he put it. He also points out that Nuking does not necessary mean nuclear weapons.
He does support the Patriot act if that is what you are refering to |
I don't see how this statement supports your point. You are saying he would rather fiercely bomb to hell a sovereign nation than have our troops be killed. THIS IS STILL A WAR!!! I don't see how that means that he does not support the war in Iraq if he stil believes in continuing in one way or another. "To my utter despair I have discovered, and discover every day anew, that there is in the masses no revolutionary idea or hope or passion.”
-Mikhail Bakunin
"Does it follow that I reject all authority? Perish the thought. In the matter of boots, I defer to the authority of the boot-maker."
-Mikhail Bakunin
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
-Noam Chomsky |