View Single Post
Old 05-21-2005, 01:08 PM   #13 (permalink)
tadpole256
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,486
Country:
Points: 55,597, Level: 100
Points: 55,597, Level: 100 Points: 55,597, Level: 100 Points: 55,597, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 36%
Activity: 36% Activity: 36% Activity: 36%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
Being a conservative, I like more than others hate governmental intrusion. However, I think that it is a fools errand to demand that the government protect us, and then not to provide the government with the tools necessary to do the job.

I believe that provisions of our this bill provide some of those tools necessary. I also believe that it is a good first step in outlawing the practice of allowing the very government that is meant to protect us from issuing identification to illegal immigrants. Regardless of how you feel over the immigration topic, one thing is very clear, when government rewards criminals, something is wrong.

dmk
But I suspect that with a little more thought and care given to the subject we could find ways that are much better and less intrusive to our people. Granted, this bill in it's current form is not so bad, but you must be able to look down the road and see what it could lead to, then you have to be able to be proactive enough to prevent the bad possibilities. Protection is one thing, infringement on rights is another. I for one will not trade my rights for the illusion of security.