Originally Posted by foundit66

Hmmm...
Your original comment made no mention of the uncle and his position of power in a state prosecution of a state drug charge...

Instead, you started asking pointless questions about how the president was...

Were you implying that the president had something to do with a STATE drug charge receiving limited prosecution?

Are you implying that it makes as much sense for the president to be involved in a state drug charge, as it does for the defendant's UNCLE, who also happens to be the governor of the state in question, to be involved?

Or are you just now changing your story because by some miracle, you've actually realized how ridiculous your earlier reply was?



Yeah. Because the "my brother saw fit to ensure that my nephew was treated with kid gloves" just doesn't sound like a bright thing to brag about...
<end sarcasm>

Do you think she would be boasting about it if he did get his nephew a reduced sentence?

And does it REALLY make any sense to you that the GOVERNOR is wanting to put pressure on the prosecution of a case, that is to try and get the "FULLEST" extent accomplished, but then the "FULLEST" isn't accomplished?



You should go back to trying to point fingers at the president. THAT made more sense...