Thread: NSA wiretapping: a bigger issue than thought
View Single Post
Old 05-30-2006, 03:00 PM   #30 (permalink)
foundit66
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
The original article cited is about 3 phone companies ALLEGEDLY sharing phone numbers with the NSA.
That is NOT wire-tapping.
Okay. This is going to be tough for you, but bear with it...
Here's a relatively simple question. I've even dumbed it down for you so it's "yes/no", but feel free to elaborate on your response if you feel you need to.

Here it goes...
Have I EVER claimed that "sharing phone numbers with the NSA" is "wire-tapping"?

Come on. You can answer it. It's such a simple question...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson
So go ahead and keep post-humping me here, but you're wrong. Again. This thread is NOT about wire-tapping.
0) Blind contradiction is not an argument. To argue against you on your diminutive level, maybe I should just say "Yes it is..."

1) YOU specifically mentioned wire-tapping, prompting my response.

2) Title of this thread: "NSA wiretapping: a bigger issue than thought"

3) Do you want to continue a discussion about wire-tapping on a "wire-tapping" thread?
Or is your response just a ploy to avoid such a discussion, as you know the president's actions were illegal and you just don't want to talk about it?
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher