Quote: |
Originally Posted by foundit66 Actually, yes. I can.
It's just that my explanation, as you keep pointing out, lacks evidence.
There is nothing "wildly STUPID" about thinking that the governor could have been involved in getting his nephew a reduced sentence.
I have ignored nothing my little simpleton.
My response: "And if a hotel employee hadn't noticed something amiss at the Watergate, it's very possible that those break-ins would have had "no evidence" either..."
Do you need me to spell it out to you what that means? | But there's a little problem for people like you... Quote: | There's no evidence Ashcroft intervened on behalf of his nephew. | |