Why don't you ask him or wait for him to reply? I was saying what I thought his opinions were. As far as I know, hev has no religion. Therefore he is fundamentally unable to be a religious bigot because if he hates all religions (and he can not be partial to his own because he doesn't have one) then he does not fit your definition. I still think we should wait for him to speak for himself though.

This still doesn't change the fact that your justification, at least in this thread, for calling hev a religious bigot is made simply by SUBSTITUTING YOUR WORDS WITH HIS. I thought this was utterly wrong and probably one of the stupidest argumentative tactics I have ever seen. If you are indeed a person of character and intelligence, you would admit that you were wrong and perhaps make a concession to hev, if not apologize. Instead you continue to either make yourself out to be a person of low character and intelligence, or you are actually one. You continue to make the decisions for yourself.