View Single Post
Old 06-26-2006, 11:58 AM   #16 (permalink)
Tabris
Block Captain
 
Tabris's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 367
Country:
Points: 3,283, Level: 35
Points: 3,283, Level: 35 Points: 3,283, Level: 35 Points: 3,283, Level: 35
Level up: 56%, 67 Points needed
Level up: 56% Level up: 56% Level up: 56%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via MSN to Tabris
Tabris is offline
Reply With Quote
 
The biggest thing is....it's gay pedophilia. It's pedophilia because it's a child...and also homosexual because it's a child of the same sex. Homsexuality and pedophilia are completely separate entities, but they are NOT mutally exclusive. One can be a homosexual pedophile or a heterosexual pedophile.

I am NOT connecting homosexuality with pedophilia at all, and people have misunderstood me and thought that. But the fact male sexually does anything with another male makes it homosexual, so to me it makes sense but is jus being overly redundant to point out the fact he's gay.

It's like saying...a black person is African-American. Haitians are black, some people from Trinidad are black, but that does not make them African-American, whereas not all AFrican-Americans are black (Egypt?). The same goes for homsexuality and pedophilia. There are gay people, there are pedophiles, and there are gay pedophiles. There are black people, there are Africans, and there are black Africans. It's a shitty example so I apologize but I just don't want to get flamed for saying gays are pedophiles, or that I'm somehow equating blacks with pedophiles or gays.
If the opposite of pro is con, what is Congress?