| Congressional Representative Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Needham, MA Posts: 2,335 Level up: 13%, 263 Points needed |  |  Quote: |
Originally Posted by Katczinsky Scientific analysis has already proven that thermate was used in the buildings. There has already been witness accounts and video evidence to explosives; but now there is concrete scientific evidence of incendiaries.
Whether or not you believe it or not, I believe this should at least make people give the alternate 9/11 scenerio probabilities credence. Doing otherwise would to be closing your mind and submiting to preconcieved notions. BYU Physics Prof. finds thermate Scientific Analysis Proves Towers Brought Down By Incendiaries Interview with professor Steven Jones
The professor Steven Jones brings up even more good points, which many havn't heard before. Including the fact that NIST, the official laboratory that studied the collapses, contracted with Underwriters Laboratories (the company that certified the steel componets used in the constuction of the WTC towers) to test actual scale models of the floor trusses as they were in the WTC; and subject them to intense fire indurance tests. And guess what, the models did not collapse. But of coarse you don't hear about this in the mainstream. MIT Engineer Explains WTC Controlled Demolition | Probably because the government wanted to cover up the fact that al-Qaeda operatives were able to infiltrate the towers and plant explosives.
This is the conclusion I have made. Most people who agree there is some kind of conspiracy or that the official story isn't true struck this idea down immediately even though it is no less impractical than the entire theory that the Neocons orchestrated it all. Actually it makes a lot more sense and is more practical...gosh. But it don't take much to get me by
So just booze me up and get me high
Ween |