View Single Post
Old 07-27-2006, 12:32 PM   #44 (permalink)
foundit66
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
Then you should be for vouchers.
If we are going to give parents "vouchers" because they want to send their kid somewhere else, then I should get a tax rebate because I don't have any kids and shouldn't have to fund the public school system.

This "vouchers" crap is ridiculous.
You ARE CHOOSING to shop somewhere else, so don't expect to use your wal-mart coupon at k-mart.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
The democrats are against them because it would weaken the unions who are a democratic voting block. It's impossible to fire an incompetent teacher because that person is a democratic vote.
Personally, I would have no problem with giving more capability to fire incompetent teachers.
Does that make me a Republican?
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher