Quote: |
Originally Posted by alias I think Bush's argument is he is not for creating life to destroy it, even for medical reasons. I haven't given this much thought and I don't have a position on it. It's scary that's for sure. | Well I believe this was to use blastocysts that already exist, and are already frozen in storage. Blastocysts that will end up destroyed anyway. Why not save lives with these if they're going to be destroyed anyway? Unfortunately Bush doesn't see this.
And anyway, his whole theory on the issue totally expresses his complete hypocracy. He says we shouldn't destroy life to save life....yet, he's so willing to use military action in "pre-emptive warfare" to "save lives", even when over a hundred thousand civilians have died (oh but of coarse collateral damage is supposed to be expected). "If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche
Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72 |