View Single Post
Old 07-28-2006, 05:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
foundit66
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
I think Bush's argument is he is not for creating life to destroy it, even for medical reasons. I haven't given this much thought and I don't have a position on it. It's scary that's for sure.
As one of the articles pointed out, your claim is just PURE CRAP.

If you're against creating life which will be destroyed, then you have to be against IVF in the first place.

Alias? Do you have ANY CLUE about what IVF consists of? How many "lives" are "created" (in other people's line of thinking) in order to try and produce ONE pregnancy?
Do you have any clue about how many IVF "lives" are "destroyed" per IVF attempt???

Yet these idiots don't make laws against IVF. They make laws against the research WHICH CAN SAVE lives.


It's like a manager being against food waste. Because he is against food waste, he insists that every amount of food that is actually wasted by thrown in the trash if it isn't sold to a customer. Can't give it to the poor. You have to destroy it or hope a customer buys it.
It's missing the bigger picture of life.
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher